Digital SLR Camera
 Location:  Home » Store » Sigma APO Teleconverter 2x EX DG for Sigma SLR Cameras  

Sigma APO Teleconverter 2x EX DG for Sigma SLR Cameras

Sigma APO Teleconverter 2x EX DG for Sigma SLR CamerasBrand: Sigma
Category: Photography

Buy New: Too low to display
as of 9/10/2010 14:48 CDT details



Seller: Amazon.com
Rating: 3.0 out of 5 stars 20 reviews

Media: Electronics
Batteries Included: No
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 4.2 x 3.5 x 3.5

MPN: B000FG6CNI
Model: B000FG6CNI
UPC: 085126876401
EAN: 0085126876401
ASIN: B000FG6CNI

Shipping: Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours

Accessories:


Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
The new multi layer lens coating and lens design reduce flare and ghost, which is a common problem with digital cameras and also creates an optimum color balance through the entire zoom range. Sigma APO Tele Converter is a dedicated Tele Converter lens, which should be used with listed lenses only.


Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 20



5 out of 5 stars Sigma 2X EX DG APO Teleconverter for Nikon AF Cameras   February 16, 2007
T. Spencer (Atlanta, GA)
57 out of 59 found this review helpful

After reading the two reviews above, I was somewhat baffled. If you do any research on this product, you will find it clearly is made only for use with Sigma lenses, not Nikon lenses. The instruction manual that comes with the converter even lists which specific Sigma lenses to use. If you want a converter for Nikon lenses, buy the Nikon TC-20E (retails for more than twice the Sigma). Of course the quality of this product is poor when using a Nikon lens! I have a Sigma 70-200 zoom and it works beautifully; it is well worth the price.


5 out of 5 stars Great Kit to have with Sigma lens   August 7, 2009
Ali, (Doha, Qatar)
5 out of 5 found this review helpful

Hi,
I have Sigma 50-500mm lens, with Nikon D90 camera, so this x2 teleconverter used to get 1000mm focal length, and it was more than GOOD. You will need the stand for your camera and you will get real nice and far shots.

To see the result please visite my flickr account on this link:
[...]

The only shortage is the fatc that you can't use it with Nikon lenses, I don't have other Sigma than 50-500mm, so I don't know if it will work with others like Sigma 50mm, or 70-300mm or any other sigma lens.(it should works)


If you will capture birds, wild-life or the sky, I think you will need it.



5 out of 5 stars Great for the price   January 29, 2009
T. Swanson (Texas)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful

I have the Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS lens (and yes, it's much better than the Sigma!). My Sigma AF went out less than 2 months use. So I am very pleased to find out that this teleconverter works with My canon. The pictures came out better with this Sigma converter and the Canon lens - than the Sigma lens with the Sigma converter. Picture quality will always suffer slightly because of this teleconverter.

I also tried the Canon Lens on a Canon Converter. Honestly - I could not see a difference. Other than color of the converter.

Good Buy - Cheap enuff to buy the 1.4 converter too.





4 out of 5 stars Useful enhancement, within reason   May 21, 2009
Photoleif (colorado, usa)
28 out of 29 found this review helpful

First, to set things straight: this TC is intended for only Canon cameras, and for Sigma lenses that mount on a Canon camera. Anything else, you're taking your chances. Second, there are optical laws that invariably predict a 2-stop decrease in the amount of light hitting the sensor. And finally, glass, no matter which brand or how many exotic elements in it, has undesirable characteristics and you will always lose some amount of clarity, saturation and perceived quality (how much varies from lens to lens and eye to eye).

Now that those fundamentals are out of the way, the results and recommendations. I took several photos using this TC mounted on my Sigma 70-200/2.8 and my Sigma 150-500/5.6~6.3. I also attempted to mount my Canon 28-70/2.8L on it, but the fit did not work (it scrapes and sticks and will not lock into place), and thus I believe they are incompatible. I did not test it with my Sigma 10-20/4.5~5.6 for obvious reasons.

AF is maintained throughout the entire range of the 70-200/2.8, as advertised in Sigma's compatibility chart. MF is engaged electronically for the entire range on the 150-500/5.6~6.3, again per the chart. AF through the 70-200 is solid, accurate, and has no degradation of speed. MF through the 150-500 @ 500 is, as one should understand, a touchy process, though it's aided considerably by the optical stabilization function.

Image quality @ 500mm (really, 1000mm) is not spectacular (though what does one expect, given a maximum aperture of about f/12.9). I didn't expect wonders but I had hopes of better. Some of this is inevitably due to my challenge in focusing, which is difficult without a split-prism finder. The image quality is still fairly bright and saturated, but somewhat noisy-looking. Exposure was accurate. I need to test on monochromatic surfaces to determine what's going on with the noise.

Tripod-mounting the camera, lens and TC for the 1000mm (500mm doubled) test shots produced the best results, improving further with MLU enabled and use of an IR remote. Image quality @ 400mm (200mm doubled) is acceptable and this should be the recommended pairing of lens and teleconverter (70-200/2.8 with this TC). This pairing results in a decent-quality 400/5.6 for well below the price of Canon's prime and zoom lenses in this range. I won't claim that the image quality is better; just, it's decent, and you save a lot of money.

Build quality of the TC is fine and nothing is worth further comment other than that it's a solid, well-built TC with multicoated elements.

I wavered between a 3-star and 4-star rating. I have owned two other TCs, and they were unquestionably 1-star at best. I went with four for this one because of its good performance with the 70-200/2.8, maintaining AF with that lens, and having pleasing build quality (I have no concerns about taking it out and using it frequently). I am however disappointed about the performance with the 150-500/4.5~5.6. I would give it a 3-star for its performance with the 150-500. I think it should at least attempt AF, and if the user has to give up and set it to MF, fine. Here, we don't even have that luxury, and there's no explanation on Sigma's website or the product literature. So, if you are considering this to get yourself a cheap 1000mm lens, be aware of the drawbacks (full-time MF, somewhat noisy images, and challenging focusing in even overcast light). If you're wanting to extend a 70-200, this is the sweet-spot.



4 out of 5 stars Very pleased   May 2, 2008
Ronnie Phipps (Tn. USA)
15 out of 16 found this review helpful

I got this 2x converter to match the Sigma 70/200 2.8 lens. I have shot around 100 pics with this set up and have been very pleased with the results. I have shot wildlife to school track meets.
The only reason I couldn't give this converter a perfect mark is I can't use it with my other Nikon lens.


Showing reviews 1-5 of 20


CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.